MOHD. HASRAT ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/359/2025 · 2025-01-22
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116631 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116631 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4227-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 359 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Hasrat Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jyoti Rajpoot,Anuj Kumar Verma,Sachida Nand Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma,Rajesh Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Considering the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with. Petitioner should implead the concerned Police OfÏcials as opposite parties during course of the day and correct the copies of the learned Standing Counsel and the counsel for Nagar Nigam also by arraying them as opposite parties. As alleged, there is an encroachment on the public road. Counsel for Nagar Nigam says that the Police force has been requisitioned, as and when it will be provided, the same will be removed. As of now, the same has not been provided. Let the concerned Police OfÏcials provide necessary police force for removal of the encroachment at the earliest, but possibly within three weeks. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sri Shishir Singh Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel shall communicate this order to the Police Commissioner, Lucknow and the concerned Police OfÏcials for compliance. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench