IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71195 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2025 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vikash kumar Das, S/O Ramu Das R/O Vill.- Chandhapur, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar- A.P.P. Mr. Rabish Kumar Mr. Adarsh Gaurav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 15-10-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 21 years and the informant alleges that petitioner has assaulted him by Kulhadi causing injury on his head and when his mother and brother came to save him, accused assaulted them with lathi, danda and rod. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71195 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the date of occurrence is 08-06-25 and the FIR came to be instituted on 12-6-25, i.e. after a delay of 4 days without any plausible explanation. It is further submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, an altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting, then the blow was not repeated and the petitioner is a young boy aged about 21 years and in the event, if he is sent to judicial custody, his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence. 5. The learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel for the Informant opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71195 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Kalyanpur P. S. Case No.206 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his cousin brother Vikash Kumar. 7. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T