RAJENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND 4 OTHERS
/381/2025 · 2025-01-24
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116562 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116562 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4723-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 381 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar,Krishna Gopal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The petitioner alleges encroachment of his land by the opposite party no. 5, who is a private person. If it is so, the petitioner should initiate proceedings under civil or criminal law, as the case may be. A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable, as, it involves private dispute. The writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench