RASPAL SINGH ALIAS ANMOL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3501/2025 · 2025-05-02
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11656 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11656 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:13340 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3501 of 2025
------ Raspal Singh @ Anmol, aged about 30 years, son of Late Pavittar Singh Randhawa, resident of House No.-118, Line No.-05, Manifit, P.O. & P.S.-Telco, District-East Singbhum, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate
: Mr. Sagar Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Addl.P.P
For the Informant : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate
------
Order No.02 Dated- 02-05-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.20 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 109(1), 118(1), 118(2), 126(2) and 117(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being member of an unlawful assembly, in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder the four alleged victims. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and only on the basis of CCTV footage, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that there was a free fight between the parties. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-18 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.02.2025 as is evident from para-19 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.20 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/