Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11652 (UTT)

HIMANSHU ARORA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2178/2021 · 2025-05-19

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2178 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Yogesh Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation, the charge-sheet has been submitted on 21.05.2022 against the petitioner nos.1, 2 and 3 while petitioner nos.4, 5 and 6 have been exonerated on 14.05.2022. 4. This fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, nothing remains to be decided in this present petition. The same is dismissed as infructuous. 6. However, it is open to the charge- sheeted petitioners to challenge the charge- sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 19.05.2025 Ravi