Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 116512 (PNJ)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/25185/2024 · 2025-02-18

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP No.25185 of 2024 (O&M) along with connected petition 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.269 Date of Decision: 18.02.2025 1) CWP No.25185 of 2024 (O&M) Anil Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents 2) CWP No.31313 of 2024 Gautam .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Jasbir Singh Mor, Advocate, and Mr. Harender Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No.25185 of 2024. Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No.31313 of 2024. Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) These petitions have been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari setting aside the public notice dated 28.07.2024, Annexure P-11, whereby the petitioners were declared ineligible on account of being overage for the post of TGT English in response to advertisement 02/2023, category 1, for Rest of Haryana (ROH) cadre. MANINDER 2025.02.24 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP No.25185 of 2024 (O&M) along with connected petition 2 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions received from Secretary of the Commission vide separate memos dated 18.02.2025, contends that the petitioners-Anil Kumar and Gautam, bearing roll nos.2236004489 and 2236001284, respectively, have secured more marks than the last selected candidates, and fall in the selection zone under EWS category in ROH cadre. Accordingly, they have been recommended for the posts in question. 3. In view thereof, the petitions stand disposed of with a direction to the respondents to give appointment to the petitioners against the recommended posts as per merit subject to their fulfilling the other eligibility conditions, along with all consequential benefits notionally from the date other selected candidates pursuant to the selection in question have been appointed and actually from the date of joining. These directions shall be carried out within four weeks of receiving a certified copy of this order. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 5. A photocopy of this order be placed on connected file. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 18.02.2025 Maninder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANINDER 2025.02.24 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.