Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11650 (JHR)

RABIK ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3675/2025 · 2025-07-10

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:18602 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3675 of 2025 ----- Rakib Ansari, S/o Ahid Miyan, R/o Village Nagadari, P.O. Baskupi, P.S. Karon, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, AddI. P.P. …...... 06/ 10.07.2025: Defect(s) as pointed by the Office is ignored for the present. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 3. This is an application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 127(2), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 262, 263, 109, 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Karon P.S. Case No.23 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur. 4. The police went to arrest some criminals when this petitioner and others villagers obstructed them, prevented the police from performing their duties and also pelted the stones and they used criminal force in obstructing the police officials. They wanted to give safe passage to the criminals. 5. Considering the aforesaid allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Petitioner is directed to appear before the court concerned. Once the petitioner appears before the court concerned, his cases shall be considered individually considering the individual overt acts of the petitioner and also the status of the other co-accused persons. 7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./