Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11646 (CHH)

DR. SATINDER SINGH CHHABRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/806/2025 · 2025-03-05

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:10686-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 806 of 2025 Dr. Satinder Singh Chhabra S/o Harjinder Singh Chhabra Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Khapri, Durg (C.G.) (Accused) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sho, Police Station - Pathhalgaon, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 2 - Shri Bajrang Sharma S/o Late Ramsharan Sharma Aged About 61 Years R/o Pathhalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.) (Complainant) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 05.03.2025 1. Heard Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1 / State. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.03.06 10:32:11 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “ i. quash the FIR dated 17.06.2022 of crime No. 198/2022, registered at Police Station - Pathhalgaon, District - Jashpur(C.G.) registered u/s 420 of IPC and entire Challan no. 273/2022, filed u/s 420 of IPC at Police Station - Pathhalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.) (Annex.P-1); and ii. quash the impugned order of taking cognizance of offence u/s 420 of IPC, dated 17.12.2024, passed in criminal case no. 1077/2024 (Annex. P-2) pending before the learned JMFC, Pathhalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) in the interest of justice” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition stating that in the present matter, charges have already been framed against the petitioner and the same needs to be challenged further. 4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. 5. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present. 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet