I ' i '4 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 751 OF 2001 Appeal under section 100 of C.P.C, against orders against the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.32/1999 dated 29th day of December, 2000 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool District. Between: R.S.Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o Regati Sanjeeva Reddy, 51 years, D.No. 7/5-3 Nehru Nagar, Dhone, Kurnool District. ...Plaintiff/ Respondent/Appellant. AND 1. M/s. Kwality Mineral Industries by its Managing Partner, V.Venkateswarlu, S/o Govindu, H.No. 13/38, Pathapeta, Dhone, Kurnool District. 2. Varigaddi Venkateswarlu, S/o Govindu, H.No. 13-38, Dhone, Kurnool District. 3. Shaik Akbar Basha, S/o Hussain Saheb, 48 yrs, H.No. 21/20, Pathapeta, Dhone, Kurnool District. 4. Varigaddi Gvondu, S/o Pullaih, H. No. 13/38, Pathapeta, Dhone, Kurnool District. 5. Telugu Venkataiah, S/o Telugu Ramana, R.S. Rangapuram Betamcherla Mandal, Kurnool District. 6. T. Lakshmaiah, S/o Narasaiah (Died) 7. Harendra M. Shah, S/o Himmathlala Shah Jain, 8. Aravind J. Patel, S/o Jasubai Patel Jain, R.7 & R.S are partners of Western India Mining Co., Co, 178, Samuel Street, Bombay-9. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati Counsel for the Respondents : Sri C.Prakash Reddy The Court made the following: ...Respondents/Respondents 0. APHC010135862001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 751/2001 [3368] Between; ...APPELLANT R.s.ramakrishna Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT Kwality Mineral Industries /' Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1 .SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent; 1.0 PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following Judgment; Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that inspite of his best efforts, the appellant is not coming forward to prosecute the case and hence, necessary orders may be rendered in this appeal. Learned counsel for respondent is in attendance. 2. *■, } 2 of the matter, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand 3. In that view closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO deputy REptSTRAR SECTION OFFICER , Kurnool District [with records if , Kurnool, Kurnool District [with / //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Civil Judge[Junior Divisionl, Dhone any] 111 Additional District Judge 3 OneCC ot Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC ot SriC Pratesh Reddy, Adv°c^^^l g, 5. The Section Officer, VK beciion, my Amaravati 6. Three CD Copies 2. The MV RAM HIGH COURT DATED; 17/06/2025 JUDGMENT SA.No.751 of 2001 DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEA FOR NON-PROSECUTION WIHTOUT COSTS