Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11644 (UTT)

PALAGATI RANGA REDDY AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1136/2025 · 2025-09-24

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8574 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1136 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Arvind Vashisth, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh and Mr. Abhishek Anthwal, learned counsel for petitioners. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned D.A.G. and Mr. Bhaskar Chandr Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 and 2. 3. By means of this criminal writ petition, petitioners have put to challenge the impugned FIR No.0031 of 2025 dated 14.05.2025, for the offence punishable under Section 318(4) of BNS 2023, registered with P.S. Shrinagar, District Pauri Garhwal. 4. After arguing a while, learned senior counsel for the petitioners has limited his argument to the extent that the Investigating Agency should comply with the guidelines given in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Another reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 5. Since the offence under Section 318(4) BNS 2023, carries a punishment maximum to seven years, therefore, before resorting to any arrest a prior notice under Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 (under Section 41A of 2025:UHC:8574 Cr.P.C.) is necessary to be issued to the petitioners. Hence, it is provided that before taking any coercive measures against the present petitioners, Investigating Officer shall abide by procedure given under Section 35(3) of the BNSS Act, 2023 (under Section 41A of Cr.P.C.). It is also directed that the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation. 6. Accordingly, the present criminal writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 24.09.2025 PN