CRM-M-11856 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 131 Girraj Bansal Krishiacharya Technologies Pvt. Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. 528 of Bhar 16.01.2025 Gurugram Shubh Labh Agritech Pvt. Ltd. NACT/489 Instruments Act, 1881 petitioner had been dismissed and non against him. 2. falsely implicated in the aforesaid complaint. directors of accused No. 2 in the aforesaid compla complaint, the dispute stands amicably settled between the parties through settlement deed dated 02.08.2024, which has been placed on record before the 11856-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Girraj Bansal Versus Krishiacharya Technologies Pvt. Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Karanjeet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 16.01.2025, passed by the Court of learned Gurugram in case titled as Krishiacharya Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. Om Shri Shubh Labh Agritech Pvt. Ltd., arising out of NACT/48972/2022, filed under Sections Instruments Act, 1881, whereby exemption application as moved by the petitioner had been dismissed and non- against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid complaint. directors of Om Shri Shubh Labh Agritech Pvt. Ltd accused No. 2 in the aforesaid compla complaint, the dispute stands amicably settled between the parties through settlement deed dated 02.08.2024, which has been placed on record before the IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11856-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.03.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondent JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Karanjeet Singh Brar, Advocate The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of order dated Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Krishiacharya Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. Om Shri arising out of complaint bearing No. s 138 and 142 of the Negotiable exemption application as moved by the -bailable warrants had been issued Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid complaint. The petitioner is one of the Om Shri Shubh Labh Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and has been arraigned as accused No. 2 in the aforesaid complaint. During the pendency of the complaint, the dispute stands amicably settled between the parties through settlement deed dated 02.08.2024, which has been placed on record before the -1- 2025 (O&M) 04.03.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section for quashing of order dated First Class, Krishiacharya Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. Om Shri complaint bearing No. of the Negotiable exemption application as moved by the bailable warrants had been issued Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been The petitioner is one of the . and has been arraigned as int. During the pendency of the complaint, the dispute stands amicably settled between the parties through settlement deed dated 02.08.2024, which has been placed on record before the MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.03.05 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-11856 learned trial Court. The learned trial Court had adjourned the case to 16.01.2025 as part payment was to be made by the accused and extension of time was sought for the said purpose. However, the learned trial Court had declined the application moved by the petitioner seeking exemption from personal appearance and had issued n 02.05.2025 on the grounds that after being granted bail, several similar applications were filed on his behalf and that cost of Rs. 500/ deposited by the accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner fur submits that his intentional nor deliberate bona fide learned trial Court and this Court. He undertakes to attend the Court proceedings, as and when he is required to do so. It is, therefore, urged that the petiti allowed. 3. length and have also gone through the material placed on record 4. learned trial Court and thereafter, on different occasions, his personal appearance before the Court was exempted on his moving applications for the said purpose. application moved by him seeking exemption from dismissed by the learned trial Court and non issued against him for 02.05.2025. between the parties to 11856-2025 (O&M) learned trial Court. The learned trial Court had adjourned the case to 6.01.2025 as part payment was to be made by the accused and extension of time was sought for the said purpose. However, the learned trial Court had declined the application moved by the petitioner seeking exemption from personal appearance and had issued non 02.05.2025 on the grounds that after being granted bail, several similar applications were filed on his behalf and that cost of Rs. 500/ deposited by the accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner fur submits that his absence before the Court on the said date was neither intentional nor deliberate and he had moved aforesaid application under a belief that it would be allowed learned trial Court and abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed by this Court. He undertakes to attend the Court proceedings, as and when he is required to do so. It is, therefore, urged that the petiti I have heard learned counsel for the length and have also gone through the material placed on record Admittedly, the petitioner was granted concession of bail by the trial Court and thereafter, on different occasions, his personal appearance before the Court was exempted on his moving applications for the said purpose. However, when the case was fixed for 16.01.2025, the application moved by him seeking exemption from dismissed by the learned trial Court and non issued against him for 02.05.2025. The matter is stated to be amicably settled between the parties to lis. The petitioner is ready to learned trial Court. The learned trial Court had adjourned the case to 6.01.2025 as part payment was to be made by the accused and extension of time was sought for the said purpose. However, the learned trial Court had declined the application moved by the petitioner seeking exemption from on-bailable warrants against him for 02.05.2025 on the grounds that after being granted bail, several similar applications were filed on his behalf and that cost of Rs. 500/- was not deposited by the accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner fur absence before the Court on the said date was neither and he had moved aforesaid application under a belief that it would be allowed. He is ready to appear before the by the terms and conditions to be imposed by this Court. He undertakes to attend the Court proceedings, as and when he is required to do so. It is, therefore, urged that the petition deserves to be I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at considerable length and have also gone through the material placed on record. the petitioner was granted concession of bail by the trial Court and thereafter, on different occasions, his personal appearance before the Court was exempted on his moving applications for the However, when the case was fixed for 16.01.2025, the application moved by him seeking exemption from personal appearance was dismissed by the learned trial Court and non-bailable warrants have been The matter is stated to be amicably settled is ready to appear before the learned -2- learned trial Court. The learned trial Court had adjourned the case to 6.01.2025 as part payment was to be made by the accused and extension of time was sought for the said purpose. However, the learned trial Court had declined the application moved by the petitioner seeking exemption from bailable warrants against him for 02.05.2025 on the grounds that after being granted bail, several similar was not deposited by the accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner further absence before the Court on the said date was neither and he had moved aforesaid application under a appear before the by the terms and conditions to be imposed by this Court. He undertakes to attend the Court proceedings, as and when he is on deserves to be at considerable the petitioner was granted concession of bail by the trial Court and thereafter, on different occasions, his personal appearance before the Court was exempted on his moving applications for the However, when the case was fixed for 16.01.2025, the personal appearance was bailable warrants have been The matter is stated to be amicably settled appear before the learned MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.03.05 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-11856 trial Court and circumstances, I am of t some leniency in the matter. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of. The petitioner is before the date fixed before it and the learned trial Court, subject to his furnishing fresh personal/su its satisfaction and subject to deposit of cost already imposed by the learned trial Court. 5. arrest shall remain stayed. 04.03.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 11856-2025 (O&M) trial Court and join the proceedings. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner deserves some leniency in the matter. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed petitioner is directed to appear before the learned trial Court before the date fixed before it and on doing so, he shall be released on bail by the learned trial Court, subject to his furnishing fresh personal/su its satisfaction and subject to deposit of cost already imposed by the learned trial Court. Till the time petitioner appears before the learned trial Court, his arrest shall remain stayed. 04.03.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and he considered opinion that the petitioner deserves some leniency in the matter. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed appear before the learned trial Court on or on doing so, he shall be released on bail by the learned trial Court, subject to his furnishing fresh personal/surety bonds to its satisfaction and subject to deposit of cost already imposed by the learned Till the time petitioner appears before the learned trial Court, his (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -3- Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and he considered opinion that the petitioner deserves some leniency in the matter. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed on or on doing so, he shall be released on bail by rety bonds to its satisfaction and subject to deposit of cost already imposed by the learned Till the time petitioner appears before the learned trial Court, his MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.03.05 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document