Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11640 (JHR)

KALAMUDDIN v. MD. AZAD

C.M.P./387/2025 · 2025-04-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:12712 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 387 of 2025 Kalamuddin aged about 42 years, son of late Alimuddin, resident of Panah Kola, Madhupur, P.O. and P.S. Madhupur, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand …… Petitioner Versus 1. Md. Azad son of Late Md. Salim; 2. Md. Nawab son of Late Md. Salim; All resident of Mohalla Panhaiyakola, P.O. Madhupur, Sub Division Madhupur, P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar. 3. Ishart Parween W/of Late Md. Nousad, resident of 46 Abdul Aziz Road, Patherchapti, P.O. and P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar. 4. Tahira Khatoon Wife of Late Md. Halim; 5. Md. Salim son of Late Mohammad Halim; 6. Mohammad Nasim son of Late Mohammad Halim; 7. Mohammad Parwez son of Late Mohammad Halim; 8. Mohammad Zamil son of Late Mohammad Halim; 9. Mohammad Rabani son of Late Mohammad Halim; 10.Md. Jilani son of Late Md. Halim; 11. Akhrari Begum D/o Late Md. Halim; 12. Sarbari Begum D/o Late Mohammad Halim; 13. Gazala Parwin D/o Late Mohammad Halim 14. Anguri Parwin D/o Late Mohammad Halim; All resident of Madhupur Town, P.O. Madhupur, Sub Division Madhupur, P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar. 15. Abda Parveen @Tunni Khatoon W/o Late Md. Salauddin; 16.Md. Alauddin @ Sonu Son of Late Md. Salauddin; 17.Md. Nasim @ Sannu son of Late Md. Salauddin; 18. Noorjahan Khatoon D/o Late Md. Salauddin; 19. Shahjahan Khatoon D/o Late Md. Salauddin; 20. Ifat Parween D/o Late Md. Salauddin; Respondents No. 15 to 20 are resident of Mohalla Panhaiyakola, P.O. Madhupur, Sub Division Madhupur, P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar. …… Opposite Parties ( 2025:JHHC:12712 ) 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner: Mr. Binod Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : …….. 03/Dated: 29/04/2025 After some arguments, Mr. Binod Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail remedy available under the law. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/