RAJESH KUMAR v. DIRECTOR LAND RECORD, PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/38210/2025 · 2026-01-13
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1164 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1164 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
117
CWP-38210-2025
Date of Decision: 13.01.2026
RAJESH KUMAR
......PETITIONER
Versus DIRECTOR LAND RECORD, PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present:- Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Advocate and
Ms. Deepika Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Himanshu Raj, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage he would be satisfied if this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a decision, in a time bound manner, on the statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner to challenge therein the order of the District Revenue Officer-cum-Consolidation Officer, Hoshiarpur (for short-the DRO) dated 27.03.2023 and order of the Deputy Director, Land Records-cum- Consolidation Officer, Consolidation, Punjab (for short-Consolidation Officer) dated 18.09.2024.
2.
At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the aforesaid appeal filed by the petitioner against the orders of the DRO and Consolidation Officer shall be decided within two months.
3.
The afore statement made by the learned State counsel satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4.
Disposed of.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
13.01.2026
[LAPITA BANERJI] Prince
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No
PRINCE SAINI 2026.01.14 21:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document