RAKEEMUDDEEN BEG AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 2 OTHERS
/209/2025 · 2025-01-13
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116391 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116391 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2099 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 209 of 2025 Applicant :- Rakeemuddeen Beg And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Sri Ankit Kumar Porwal, learned Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Counsel for the opposite party nos.2 and 3, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been filed for the following main relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2325 of 2021; State Versus Rakeemuddin and another, arising out of Case Crime No.94 of 2012, under sections- 147, 148, 149, 332 and 323 I.P.C., relating to the Police Station- Ibrahimpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar, as well as impugned chargesheet no.80/12, dated 6.8.2012, submitted against the petitioners by the Investigating Officer in aforesaid case crime number, as contained in Annexure no.1 to the instant petition, in the light of compromise, attained between the parties, in the interest of law and justice."
Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings i.e. Case Crime No. 94 of 2012 (supra), shall appear before the concerned Court within six weeks from today and file the compromise. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the
concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two weeks' from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the Counsel for the applicants, after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
Order Date :- 13.1.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench