HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 3954/2025 Akhtar Hussain @ Bhayyu S/o Abdul Khalik, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Near Bibi Jhohra Masjid, Patanpole, Chandraghanta, P.s. Makabra, Dist. Kota (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Amit Dadhich, Adv. For Respondent : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 08/04/2025 1. The present second bail application has been filed by the accused-applicant under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. 2. Leaned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant was enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.08.2020 passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.6803/2020. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant also submits that thereafter, on 26.02.2024, the accused-applicant could not attend the Court due to illness of his wife, therefore, his bail bonds were forfeited. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-applicant was produced before learned Additional Sessions Judge No.6, Kota (hereinafter referred to as learned 'trial Court') on 30.01.2025 and on the same day, he (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3954/2025] was taken into custody and since then, the accused-applicant is behind the bars. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant contends that learned trial Court has rejected the bail application of the accused- applicant vide order dated 05.02.2025. Learned counsel also contended that the accused-applicant has deposited the amount of Rs.10,000/- of the forfeited bail bonds, as ordered by learned trial Court. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant argues that the accused-applicant is ready and willing to furnish fresh bail bonds and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused- applicant be granted benefit of bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes this second bail application. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 7. Admittedly, the accused-applicant is facing the trial for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC before learned trial Court. The accused-applicant was granted benefit of bail vide order dated 05.08.2020 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.6803/2020. The accused-applicant was on bail till 26.02.2024 and on 26.02.2024, due to his absence from the trial Court, his bail bonds were forfeited. The accused-applicant is behind the bars since 30.01.2025. 8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the fact that the applicant was already enlarged (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3954/2025] on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the petitioner. 9. Consequently, this second bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that the applicant-Akhtar Hussain @ Bhayyu S/o Abdul Khalik, arrested in FIR No.9/2020, registered at Police Station Kaithunipole, District Kota shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- and three solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. The applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /21