Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11633 (PNJ)

ROHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/226/2025 · 2025-05-16

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

226 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ROHAN STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Present criminal writ the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus directing respondents No.2 & 3 to release the detenue, namely Kanika Upadhyay, who is alleged to be detained illegally by responden and UP Police personnel, who have abducted her. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner petition as the same has become infructuous. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn May 16, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH V/S HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Dhananjay and Sahil Jain, Advocates for Mr. Ganesh Chand Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Present criminal writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus directing respondents No.2 & 3 to release the detenue, namely Kanika Upadhyay, who is alleged to be detained illegally by responden and UP Police personnel, who have abducted her. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes as the same has become infructuous. Dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered as infructuous. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRWP-226-2025 Date of decision: 16.05.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Dhananjay and Sahil Jain, Advocates for Advocate Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana. petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus directing respondents No.2 & 3 to release the detenue, namely Kanika Upadhyay, who is alleged to be detained illegally by respondents No.6 & 7 and UP Police personnel, who have abducted her. wishes to withdraw the present as having been rendered as infructuous. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.05.17 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment