Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 116323 (ALL)

PREETU VERMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/253/2025 · 2025-01-13

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2160 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 253 of 2025 Applicant :- Preetu Verma And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Iqbal Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned criminal proceedings in complaint No.610 of 2024 under section 379 I.P.C., P.S. Mohammadi, district Kheri as well as summoning order dated 10.12.2024 passed by ACJM, Mohammadi Kheri. Learned counsel for applicants, after arguing for some time, submits that present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021, to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the petitioners appear before the trial court within 20 days from today and a bail application is filed, the same be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). The petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 13.1.2025 kkb/ Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench