MOHAMMAD SULTAN BHAT v. TASADUQ HUSSAIN MIR AND ORS. (SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/352/2021 · 2025-11-24
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11631 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11631 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 41 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 352/2021 in [SWP 100/2018] c/w SWP 100/2018
MOHAMMAD SULTAN BHAT
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs.
TASADUQ HUSSAIN MIR AND ORS.
(SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)
...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE
ORDER 24.11.2025
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. There had been no representation also in past, which makes it clear that either petitioner’s grievance has been redressed or else he would have appeared. Accordingly, proceedings are dropped and contempt is closed.
SWP 100/2018
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Nobody appeared on previous date also, which makes it clear that petitioner is not interested to prosecute this petition. Dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected CM(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 24.11.2025
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 27.11.2025 14:31