Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11629 (UTT)

SATPAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2737/2025 · 2025-09-25

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8671 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2737/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. S.C. Burman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner has challenged order dated 22.01.2025, passed by Commissioner, Garhwal Mandal, District Pauri Garhwal in Appeal No. 52 of 2023-24. 3. By said order, appeal filed by respondent No. 5 against suspension of his fair price shop license, was remanded back to the District Magistrate to reconsider the matter after hearing respondent No. 5. 4. This Court do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. 5. Stand taken by respondent No. 5 in his appeal was that he was not heard by the District Magistrate while suspending his license, therefore, the Commissioner rightly remanded the matter to take decision afresh after hearing him. 6. Thus, writ petition fails and is dismissed. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 25.09.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.09.25 17:28:01 +05'30' 2025:UHC:8671