AJAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/310/2025 · 2025-01-15
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116289 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116289 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2827-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 310 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Forest And Environment And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Pratap Singh,Ashutosh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard. Learned Standing Counsel has instructions to inform the Court that certain discrepancies / deficiencies were noticed in the running of the saw mill by the petitioner based on the provisional license issued to him, and accordingly, a report has been submitted to the State Level Committee which is to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of permanent license under Rule 5 of the U.P. Establishment and Regulation of Saw-Mills Rules, 1978, though, no decision has been taken as yet by the State Level Committee. In view of the above, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the State Level Committee i.e. opposite party no. 2 to take a decision in the matter at the earliest, say within a period of six weeks, if there is no legal impediment. If there is a legal impediment, then the same should be informed to the petitioner. It is made clear that if a decision has already been taken, the same should be communicated to the petitioner within one week. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench