Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 116276 (MAD)

Dharmaraj v. The State of Tamilnadu

CRL OP(MD)/883/2025 · 2025-01-21

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.883 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.01.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.(MD) No.883 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No.608 of 2025 Dharmaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu through The Inspector of Police, Nesamony Nagar Police Station, Kaniyakumari District. Crime No.107 of 2024 2.R.Vijayan S/o.Not Known, Sub Inspector of Police, Nesamony Nagar Police Station, Kaniyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records pertaining to the impugned F.I.R. in Crime No.107/2024 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.M.Ashwini For R1 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Criminal Side) _____________ Page No. 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.883 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking to call for the records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No. 107 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent police and to quash the same. 2. The case projected against the petitioner is that on 22.06.2024, at about 5:00 p.m., the petitioner and 342 other accused persons, in total 343, unlawfully assembled without any permission in front of the office of the District Collector, Nagercoil, and conducted a protest against the State Government regarding the death of more than 50 persons in Kallakurichi District due to the consumption of spurious liquor. They also obstructed the free flow of traffic and caused a disturbance to the public. Although the police had issued a warning, the accused persons failed to comply. Therefore, they were arrested and taken into police custody. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent, Sub-Inspector of Police, a case was registered against the 343 persons in Crime No.107 of 2023 for offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, and 290 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). _____________ Page No. 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.883 of 2025 3. The contention of the petitioner is that no specific overt act has been attributed as against the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that the facts of the case are exactly similar to those in the case reported in 2018 (2) LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and Others vs. The Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District], dated 20.09.2018, and in the case of Sri Raja vs. Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District, and others in a batch of cases in Crl.O.P (MD) No.7922 of 2019 etc., dated 30.08.2019. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), appearing for the first respondent police, submits that the petitioner and others held a protest without obtaining permission from the concerned authorities. He fairly submits that this Court, in similar cases, quashed the proceedings based on the citations referred to by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent and perused the materials on record. _____________ Page No. 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.883 of 2025 6. The facts of this case are similar to those covered by the judgment of this Court reported in 2018 (2) LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and Others vs. The Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District], dated 20.09.2018, and in the case of Sri Raja vs. Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District, and others in a batch of cases in Crl.O.P (MD) No.7922 of 2019, dated 30.08.2019. 7. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed, and the proceedings in Crime No.107 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent police are quashed not only against the petitioner but also against all the other accused who are similarly placed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 21.01.2025 Index: Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes / No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order JEN _____________ Page No. 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.883 of 2025 To: 1.The Inspector of Police, Nesamony Nagar Police Station, Kaniyakumari District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.883 of 2025 M.NIRMAL KUMAR , J. JEN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.883 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No.608 of 2025 21.01.2025 _____________ Page No. 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis