Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 116263 (PNJ)

GURDEV SINGH & ANR v. DARSHNA DEVI & ORS

RSA/867/2016 · 2025-02-18

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 229 Gurdev Singh and another Darshna Devi and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2015 passed by learned Additional District Judge, dated 30.10.2013 passed by the learned Nagar, Mohali has been set aside. stage of addressing arguments issuing notice of motion on 23.1.2017, matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on 11.1.2018 and 04.4.2018 appellants the matter was adjourned on request of lear RSA-867-2016 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.867 of 2016 Date of decision :-18.02.2025 Gurdev Singh and another Versus Darshna Devi and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellants. Mr. R.S. Duggal, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants have filed the present appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2015 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Mohali vide which the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), ar, Mohali has been set aside. The matter pertains to the year addressing arguments. The order sheets shows that issuing notice of motion on 23.1.2017, matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on 11.1.2018 and 04.4.2018 there was no representation on behalf of s and on rest of the two dates i.e. 22.8.2019 and 12.12.2019 the matter was adjourned on request of lear 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.867 of 2016 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellants …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. R.S. Duggal, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. The appellants have filed the present appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2015 passed by learned Mohali vide which the judgment and decree Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), SAS The matter pertains to the year 2016 and is still at the . The order sheets shows that after issuing notice of motion on 23.1.2017, as many as 04 times the matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on two dates i.e. there was no representation on behalf of i.e. 22.8.2019 and 12.12.2019 the matter was adjourned on request of learned proxy counsel for the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.21 15.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellants appellants appellant ha present litigation. It is to b of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellants have adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to February 1 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA-867-2016 (O & M) s. Even today there is no representation on behalf of s. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the s in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellants nor its counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall st February 18, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 . Even today there is no representation on behalf of A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of the e appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellants adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other the same for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.21 15.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document