[2025:RJ-JP:1481] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14759/2013 1. Rekha Devi W/o Shri Raju, Age About 30 Years, R/o Outside the Patan Khirkiya, Chtikna, Ward No.31, Karauli, District- Karauli (Raj.) 2. Maya W/o Shri Pappu, Age About 24 Years, R/o Outside The Patan Khirkiya, Harijan Basti, Ward No.6, Bagghikhana, Karauli, District- Karauli (Raj.) 3. Mamta W/o Shri Mahendra, Age About 27 Years, R/o Outside The Patan Khirkiya, Karauli, District- Karauli (Raj.) 4. Suman W/o Shri Dinesh, Age About 38 Years, R/o Outside The Patan Khirkiya, Karauli, District- Karauli (Raj.) 5. Meena W/o Shri Mahesh Mehtar, Age About 26 Years, R/o Behind The Veena Memorial School, Ward No. 10, Harijan Basti, Outside The Hindaun Gate, karauli, District- Karauli (Raj.) 6. Mamta Mehtar W/o Shri Deepak Mehtar, Age About 32 Years, R/o Behind The Veena Memorial School, Ward No.11, Harijan Basti, Outside the Hindaun Gate, Karauli, District- Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through The Principle Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Local Bodies, Government Of Rajasthan, Residency Road, Jaipur. 3. Nagar Parishad, Karauli, District Karauli Through Its Commissioner. 4. Nagar Parishad Karauli, District Karauli Through Its Executive Officer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Akanksha Saxena for Mr. Arvind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surya Pratap Singh Rajawat, Asst. GC with Ms. Pooja Dixit and Ms. Swati Thory for Mr. Gurucharan Singh Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL [2025:RJ-JP:1481] (2 of 2) [CW-14759/2013] Order 09/01/2025 On 27.02.2024, following order was passed: “After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted time to complete her instructions. List the matter on 01.03.2024 as “eleventh case” in the cause list as prayed.” On next date, i.e., 01.03.2024, learned counsel for the petitioners prayed for and was granted further time to complete her instructions. On next date, i.e., 05.03.2024, on her request, learned counsel for the petitioners was granted last opportunity to complete her instructions. Today also, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for time to complete her instructions. Since, more than sufficient time has already been granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners to complete her instructions, no further time is warranted. Learned counsel for the petitioners pleads no instructions. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J GAURAV/182