Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11624 (RAJ)

NISHNAT JAIN SON OF SHRI MAHESH CHAND JAIN v. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (O AND M)

CW/3815/2025 · 2025-03-20

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12671] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3815/2025 1. Nishnat Jain Son Of Shri Mahesh Chand Jain, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 14 Near Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur. 2. Arman Khan Son Of Shri Ibrahim Khan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 151, Ward No. 20 Peer Ki Mohalla, Rajakhera, District Dholpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Superintending Engineer (O And M), Jaipur Discom, Dholpur, Near Water Works Office, Machkund Road, Dholpur. 2. Assistant Engineer (O And M), Jaipur Discom, Rajakhera, District Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N K Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 20/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that instant petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation, with regard to their grievance, within a period of seven days before the Competent Authority. In view of the above as well as relying upon the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Shilpi Bose & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors. reported in 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659, the present petition is disposed of. The petitioners are granted liberty to file representation before the competent Authority within a period of 7 days. If the [2025:RJ-JP:12671] (2 of 2) [CW-3815/2025] petitioners file the representation within the period given above the respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of 15 days thereafter, in accordance with law. The respondents would be at liberty to pass any further order considering the administrative exigencies. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/151