RANJEET KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/133/2025 · 2025-01-13
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116223 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116223 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2242 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 133 of 2025 Appellant :- Ranjeet Kumar Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for appellant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present appeal has been filed for quashing of the impugned Summoning Order dated 08.02.2023 passed by Special judge SC/ST Act, Barabanki in complaint case vide Session Case No. 1157 of 2020 (Lallu Prasad versus Banwari Verma and others) under sections 323, 504 of I.P.C and Section 3(1)(r) of S.C. & S.T. Act, relating to Police Station - Deva, District Barabanki.
Learned counsel for appellant, after arguing for some time, submits that present appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra).
Order Date :- 13.1.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench