NEELAM PRAJAPATI v. STATE BANK OF INDIA BRACH NAKA DISTT. AYODHYA THRU. BRANCH MANAGER AND ANOTHER
/389/2025 · 2025-01-24
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116185 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116185 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4753-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 389 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neelam Prajapati Respondent :- State Bank Of India Brach Naka Distt. Ayodhya Thru. Branch Manager And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla,Adarsh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Anurag Srivastava Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Palash Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the opposite parties is taken on record. Heard. The petitioner has defaulted in payment of loan. She seeks sometime to pay the same. It is not a matter amenable to writ jurisdiction. The petitioner may approach the concerned Bank, which may consider the request of the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench