2025:HHC:312 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 6141 of 2024 Decided on : 02.01.2025 Rachh Pal …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though in terms of reply filed by the respondents, grievance of the petitioner stands redressed but till date the relief has not reached the petitioner. 2. In the light of the factual position, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that now let needful in terms of the reply filed by respondents be done, as expeditiously as 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:312 possible and it be ensured that the benefit of the decision of the respondents, reaches the petitioner, within a period of two months from today. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 02, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)