2025:HHC:1037 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 6575 of 2024 Decided on : 06.01.2025 Naresh Kumar. …Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bhanu Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 2, 4 & 5. Mr. Shivpal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Shivpal Manhans, learned Senior Panel Counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2, 4 & 5 and respondent No.3, respectively. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served in case the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation with further direction to the respondents to 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:1037 decide the representation of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner filing fresh representation, with regard to the issues raised in the writ petition, within a period of 3 weeks from today, let the same be decided, in view of the averments contained therein, within a period of 6 weeks’ as from the date of receipt thereof. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 06, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)