Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11613 (RAJ)

MANGI LAL v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CW/2339/2004 · 2025-09-15

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37307] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2339/2004 Mangi Lal Son Of Shri Heera Lal, aged about 34 years, R/o Gram Diloda, Panchayat Tulsa, Panchayat Samiti Baran, Distt. Baran. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Director-Cum-Special Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Bhagwati, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 15/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayers: "i) to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be commanded with a direction to absorb and regularise the services of the petitioner on the post of Gram Sewak-cum-Assistant Secretary with effect from the date, persons junior to him were absorbed/regularised. (ii) to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be commanded with a further direction that the petitioner may kindly be granted all consequential benefits arising out of it. (iii) any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iv) Cost may also be awarded to the petitioner." [2025:RJ-JP:37307] (2 of 2) [CW-2339/2004] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the petitioner has already been discontinued from his services and his order of discontinuation is not under challenge in the instant writ petition. 3. In view of the above, where order of discontinuance and termination of services is not under challenge, no relief of absorption, regularization can be claimed by the petitioner. 4. Hence, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is, hereby, dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J Daksh-Jatin/8