SUDHA AND ORS v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER AND ORS
MFA/204187/2023 · 2025-03-04
C M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11611 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11611 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 204187 OF 2023 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
1. SUDHA W/O GURANNAGOUDA, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
2. MAHADEVI W/O SHIVASHARANAPPA, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
3. GANGAMMA W/O BHAGANNA, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
ALL ARE R/O SATHKHED VILLAGE - 585325, TQ: YADRAMI, DIST: KALABURGI. ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K S SAKRY AND AYYANNA MALLABBAD ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
UKP, BHEEMARAYANAGUDI,
SHAHAPUR - 585223, DIST: YADAGIR.
2
MFA NO.204187/2023
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KALBURGI - 585102.
3.
KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, K R CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560001.
4.
AYYANNA S/O SANGAPPAGOUDA, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O SATHKHED VILLAGE - 585325, TQ: YADRAMI, DIST: KALBURGI.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 74(1) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 BY THE ADVOCATES FOR APPELLANTS PRAYS THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT PLEASE TO ALLOW THE APPEAL WITH COSTS. AND THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.04.2023 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KALBURGI IN LAC NO.22/2021 TO BE MODIFIED BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL, BY ENHANCING THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION AT Rs.9,540/- PER ACRE FOR DRY LAND WITH ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS AND WITH PROPORTIONATE COST, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
MFA NO.204187/2023 ORDER Two weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without further reference to the Bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NOTE: Vide order dated 04.03.2025 advocate for appellant has not complied the office objections. Hence appeal dismissed without further referenc to the Court.
Sd/- A ASSSSIISSTTA AN NTT R REEG GIISSTTR RA AR R
T By : SB R By : VK C By : NHD