Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 116095 (ALL)

MAHESHWAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. GRAMYA VIKAS LKO. 5 OTHERS

WRIA/258/2025 · 2025-01-10

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2071 Court No. - 17 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 258 of 2025 Petitioner :- Maheshwar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Gramya Vikas Lko. 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. The present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs : "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding and directing to the O.P.No.5 the District Development Officer, District Amethi to make payment of differences of arrears of salary since 21.08.2007 upto superannuation date 30.06.2024, in the light of the fresh pay fixation order dated 22.11.2024 passed by O.P No.5 himself. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding and directing to the O.P. No.5 the District Development Officer District Amethi to release pensionary benefit, upaddan benefit and superannuation travelling allowance etc. to petitioner. (iii) to issue a writ, order or direction to suitable nature thereby directing to the O.P. No.4 the Chief Development Officer, District Amethi to consider and decide the representation of petitioner dated 01.01.2025 pending before him, vide Annesure No.27 of the Writ Petition." Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer only to the extent that representation of the petitioner dated 01.01.2025 pending before Opposite Party No.4 i.e. Chief Development Officer, District Amethi which has been made for payment of post retiral dues after attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2024 alongwith fresh pay fixation, post retiral dues, upaddan benefits, traveling allowances, etc. which have not yet been paid, may be decided within the time as this court may deem fit. Learned Standing counsel has no objection in case any such direction to the respondent is issued to decide petitioner's representation. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the case and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, Opposite Party No.4 Chief Development Officer, District Amethi is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representations dated 01.01.2025 within a period of six weeks from the date certified copy of this order is served. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.1.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench