Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 116061 (ALL)

RAM PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY BASIC EDUAZTIN AND 5 ORS.

WRIA/322/2006 · 2025-05-15

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28678 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 322 of 2006 Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secy Basic Eduaztin And 5 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Mani Dubey,Manoj Kumar Tiwari,T.N.Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Ajai Kumar,Prashant Arora,Rahul Shukla,Rajit Ram Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Case is called out in the revised list. 2. None is present for the petitioner(s) when this case is taken up for hearing while learned Standing Counsel for the State is available. No request for adjournment has either been made on behalf of the petitioner(s). 3. From perusal of the record, it appears that since this matter pertains to the year 2006, petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing his case. Even otherwise, by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . [Brij Raj Singh, J.] Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench