SHIVAM SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
BAIL/281/2025 · 2025-01-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1911 Court No. - 7 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 281 of 2025 Applicant :- Shivam Srivastava Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.108 of 2023 under section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Nanpara, District Bahraich.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the sole case shown in the Gang Chart, the applicant has been granted bail. The co-accused has already been enlarged on bail. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.
5. Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the sole case shown against him, he is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Shivam Srivastava be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 10.1.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench