Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11600 (UTT)

ARIN CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2169/2021 · 2025-05-16

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2169 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Stuti Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ramji Shriavastava, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuli, A.G.A. for the State. 3. There is no representation for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation final report has been submitted on 28.07.2022, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly the writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 16.05.2025 SK