Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11600 (RAJ)

NIKITA SEN D/O MAHESH KUMAR SEN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/4768/2025 · 2025-04-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14986] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4768/2025 Nikita Sen D/o Mahesh Kumar Sen, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kayasth Mohalla, Near New Post Office, Old City, Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Directorate, Ayurved Department, Rajasthan, Ajmer. 3. Registrar, Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurveda University, Kadwad, Jodhpur-Nagaur Highway Road, Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishesh Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/04/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has applied for the post of Ayurveda Compounder/Nurse Junior Grade in pursuance to the advertisement No. 1/2024. It is further submitted that the candidature of the petitioner is being prejudiced for the reason, that respondents are not considering the experience certificate of the petitioner, as Yoga trainer in Ayurveda Department. Further, it is submitted that said action of the respondent is invalid and illegal for the reason that respondents have provided [2025:RJ-JP:14986] (2 of 2) [CW-4768/2025] no reasonable justification for rejecting the said experience certificate of the petitioner. Heard. Issue notice to the respondents. On directions of the Court, Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. It is noted that petitioner has approached this Court at a pre- mature juncture and this Court cannot act as a Court of first instance. Howsoever, this Court cannot restrict any person from approaching this Court, thus considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as petitioner has not made any representation before the respondents/ competent authority qua her grievance and has approached directly to this Court, in the interest of justice, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of this judgment, before the competent authority/respondents and respondents are directed to adjudicate the said representation of the petitioner, if filed, by way of a speaking order, within an upper limit of 30 days thereafter, strictly in accordance with law. It is made clear that no prejudice be caused to the rights of the petitioner and the same shall remain protected till the adjudication of the representation of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /118