NEELU SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (ENERGY) U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/267/2025 · 2025-01-22
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115970 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115970 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4197-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 267 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neelu Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Energy) U.P. Govt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikrant Prakash,Manjari Singh,Mohd. Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. Considering the order to be passed, there is no need to call for a counter affidavit. The earlier electricity bill of the petitioner has been rectified, as informed by Ms. Shreya Pahwa, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Aparajita Bansal, learned counsel for the respondents and the rectified bill is to the tune of Rs. 21552/-. Electricity meter has also been changed. Communication dated 15.01.2025 alongwith rectified bill etc. has been placed before this Court, which is taken on record. Copy of it has been given to the learned counsel for the petitioner also. The petitioner, however, is still aggrieved by this rectified bill. If it is so, the remedy lies elsewhere, may be before the same Executive Engineer under Para 6.5 of the Electricity Supply Code, 2005 or before the concerned consumer forum or such other forum or authority, as may be prescribed under the law, as disputed question of facts cannot be adjudicated by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench