HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 1790 of 2024 Bunty @ Vipin Kant ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.594 of 2023, under Sections 376, 376D, 342, 506, 370(2), 366A, 366B IPC and Section 3(a)/4 and 5(l)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the victim has already been examined at trial; her statement in examination-in-chief is not corroborating with the statement recorded in the FIR. Even otherwise, it is argued that the victim, in her cross-examination, has totally denied the prosecution case. 4. These facts are admitted by learned State Counsel. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 08.01.2025 Ravi Bisht RAVI BISHT Digitally signed by RAVI BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=ded921477e34a304cbcb0b52d4a59f37 e6d2018d38d0b669a5c068799391e6bb, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AA64B1F44E60E652AE5485ED76 4961E4E52FD29C6F03C20917020ED093405536, cn=RAVI BISHT Date: 2025.01.08 04:11:36 +05'30'