Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 115960 (PNJ)

DR. NEERAJ DALAL v. VINEET GARG AND ANR

COCP/396/2025 · 2025-02-17

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

185 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DR. NEERAJ DALAL VINEET GARG AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Rajat Mor, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for respondent order has been passed and the benefits released within a period of three days from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Rule discharged. aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additiona Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 17.02.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: DR. NEERAJ DALAL Versus VINEET GARG AND ANR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. **** MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent order has been passed and the benefits payable to released within a period of three days from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additiona as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-396-2025 Date of Decision: February 17, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for respondents submits that speaking payable to the petitioner will be released within a period of three days from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his appropriate remedies in accordance with law Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2025 February 17, 2025 that speaking will be In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner his in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be and in that eventuality, l sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.19 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document