Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 115907 (PAT)

Harinandan Kumar @ Harinandan Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./45775/2025 · 2025-10-15

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53739 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-747 Year-2024 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Abhishek Kumar S/o Damodar Paswan R/o Village - Ajhokopa P.S - Rupauli District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 45775 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-747 Year-2024 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Harinandan Kumar @ Harinandan Singh S/o- Musa Singh @ Pusa Singh @ Ram Kishori Singh Resident of Rambagh Lal Chouni, Ward No. 31, P.S. Sadar, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 53739 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 45775 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nadimul Hasan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with S.T. No. 273 of 2025/CIS No. 273 of 2025 arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 747 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1) and 61 of the BNS, 2023. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53739 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 2/2 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners are accused of killing the deceased. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. From the FIR itself it appears that the wife of the deceased had eloped with someone and because of this he has committed suicide. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed. 7. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XI, Purnea/concerned Court below in connection with S.T. No. 273 of 2025/CIS No. 273 of 2025 arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 747 of 2024. AjayMishra/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T