Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010089982025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1366/2025 AMEJ ALI @ AMIR ALI S/O ROKMAN ALI @ LOKMAN ALI R/O HABLAKHA P.S. HAJO DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, U U KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER 19.05.2025
Heard learned counsel, Mr. A. Ahmed for the petitioner - Amej Ali @ Amir Ali, who has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakha Sanhita, 2023 for prayer of bail as the petitioner is behind bars since 18.03.2025 in connection with Mukalmua P.S. Case No. 39/2025 registered under Sections 329/118(2)/109/76/304 (2)/3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
Page No.# 2/2 Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other accused named in the FIR assaulted the informant and his mother, Sahar Bhanu and his wife. It is submitted that Sahar Bhanu has sustained injuries on her head and the opinion relating to the gravity of the injury is awaited.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the informant has also arraigned his own father as an accused in connection with this case. This is a matter of family dispute relating to land. The petitioner has been behind the bars and his further custodial detention is not required for the progress of investigation. I have considered the submissions at the bar. The petitioner has been behind bars for 62 days and it appears that further custodial detention may not be required for the progress of investigation. Considering all aspects, the petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nalbari under the condition that: (i) the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged, and. (ii) the petitioner shall not exercise threats to the witnesses. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant