VINAY PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND ANOTHER
CRLA/110/2025 · 2025-01-10
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115893 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115893 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2047 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 110 of 2025 Appellant :- Vinay Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Prem Kumar,Sneha Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order.
2. The present appeal has been filed to quash summoning order dated 26.04.2022 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Pratapgarh in Sessions Trial No.270 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No.454 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 341, 386, 427 IPC and 3(2)(v), 3(2)(Va), 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) SC/ST (PA) Act, P.S. Antu, district Pratapgarh.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the appeal; rather he may be granted liberty to file bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for quashing is refused and the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the appellant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Order Date :- 10.1.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench