Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 115872 (ALL)

RAJ KUMARI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/237/2025 · 2025-01-22

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4135-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 237 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Kumari And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janendra Kumar Verma,Vivek Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1.Heard. 2. This petition has been filed being aggrieved by decision of District Level Committee rejecting the claim of the petitioner under Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana on the ground that it is time barred. However, Sri Vivek Manish Shukla, learned Standing Counsel has instructions to inform the Court that earlier claim was rejected as time barred but subsequently it was reconsidered in the light of various government orders and judgments of this Court and it was decided on 21.01.2025 on merits rejecting the claim on the ground that deceased was above 70 years of age, therefore, he was not covered under the scheme and the government orders relating thereof dated 28.02.2020, copy of the said order has been provided to the petitioner's counsel. Petition does not require any adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with liberty to challenge the said decision if there is a cause. (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench