Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11587 (JHR)

BABU ALIAS PREM LOHRA ALIAS DEVRAJ ALIAS ROHIT ALIAS PREMANAND ALIAS ISHMAIL INDWAR ALIAS TILKESHWA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3810/2025 · 2025-05-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2025:JHHC:14082] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3810 of 2025 Babu @Prem Lohra @Devraj @Rohit @Premanand @Ishmail Indwar @Tilkeshwar Gope @ Premanand Indwar, aged about 27 years, son of Vishwanath Indwar @Egnesh Indwar, resident of Murga, P.O. Kamdara, P.S. Kamdara, District-Gumla. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Puja Agarwal , Adv. For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl.PP. 02 / 09.05.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T Case No. 42 of 2023 arising out of Kolebira P.S. Case No. 64 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No. 65 of 2023(S) instituted under Sections 399 & 402 of IPC and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of Arms Act, 1959. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in preparation for committing dacoity and on seeing the police, he fled away. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and nothing has been seized from the possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that so far four witnesses have been examined in this case during the trial and none of them have identified the petitioner during their examination in the court. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 24.12.2022. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering the period in custody undergone by the petitioner and submissions of learned counsels and the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Simdega in connection with S.T Case No. 42 of 2023 arising out of Kolebira P.S. Case No. 64 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No. 65 of 2023(S) with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-