Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 115868 (ALL)

SANTOSHI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 12 OTHERS

/240/2025 · 2025-01-24

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4702-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 240 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santoshi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Raman Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Ashish Raman Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Considering the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to private opposite parties is dispensed with. 3. The petitioners allege obstruction of a 'Nali' by the private opposite parties by the side of the interlocking which hindrance his rights and also endanger interlocking, however, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has instruction to the contrary. He says that the petitioners want to have the Nali shifted and there is some dispute between the private parties. 4. Be that as it may, if matter is amenable to the jurisdiction of the Tehsildar under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 the petitioner may avail the said remedy whereupon the Tehsildar shall be obliged to do the needful but as per law and after hearing the parties. 5. However, if the said provision is not attracted, then, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek other remedies as may be prescribed in law. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 24.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench