R V Naik, v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
WP/5583/2012 · 2025-01-07
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11586 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11586 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010135602012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5583/2012 Between: R V Naik, ...PETITIONER AND Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. C SUNILKUMAR REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner.
2. This Court vide order dated 27.04.2012 directed the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.02.2012 in accordance with the rules.
3. The petitioner is challenging the proceedings dated 21.03.2012, whereby the respondents rejected the petitioner's case for promotion. A consequential direction is sought, directing the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Head of the Department/Regional Manager in the Scheduled Tribe Cadre, by observing the roster point. The petitioner was 53 years old at the time the writ petition was filed.
4. On account of the efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
07.01.2025 PNS