M/S Purnima Instruments v. Union of India through Chairman Railway Board, Rail Bhavan, Raisina Marg, New Delhi and others
ARBT/3/2022 · 2025-08-28
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115853 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115853 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. - 3 of 2022 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The record indicates that this Court by means of the order dated 10.07.2025, after hearing the parties, found that it is a fit case for being referred to the arbitrator and the Court had proposed the name of Honble Mr. Justice Shashi Kant, to act as a proposed arbitrator and sought his consent. The record indicates that by means of the letter dated 14.08.2025, the consent has been received. Accordingly, the Court appoints Honble Mr. Justice Shashi Kant, R/o G5/16, Emaar Gomti Greens, Behind Police Headquarter, Sector-7, Gomti Nagar Extension, Lucknow-226002, Mobile No.8004929799 & 9450094710 as a Arbitrator, who shall enter into the reference and decide the same. The Senior Registrar of this Court is directed to communicate the order passed today to Honble Mr. Justice Shashi Kant, who shall enter into the reference and decide the dispute arising in between the parties. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is allowed. August 28, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anand Dwivedi, S.B. Pandey (Jaspreet Singh,J.) M/S Purnima Instruments .....Applicant(s) Union Of India Through Chairman Railway Board, Rail Bhavan, Raisina Marg, New Delhi And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench