ADITYA MISHRA ALIAS CHHOTU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/201/2025 · 2025-01-20
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 115851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3364 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 201 of 2025 Applicant :- Aditya Mishra Alias Chhotu And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Iqbal Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. The present application has been filed for the following main relief:-
"WHEREFORE, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned Charge Sheet (Police Report) bearing No. 414 of 2022, dated 24.11.2022, vide Case Crime No. 392 of 2022, under Section 323, 504, 336 1.P.C., Police Station Sandi, District Hardoi and
order of cognizance and summoning order dated 12.04.2024, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4, Hardoi in the case "State Versus Kallu alias Dharmendra and others" and further proceedings of the case in pursuance thereof, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4, Hardoi, in respect of petitioners only, in the ends of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is
disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered and
decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Liberty is also granted to the applicants to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is
disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.1.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench