IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5530 of 2025 Decided on: 9th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lal Chand …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. When the matter was taken up in forenoon session, learned Deputy Advocate General was directed to have instructions in the matter about the justification of transferring the petitioner under office order dated 07.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) taking note of the decision in Lal Chand & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Anr.2 and office 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.3244 of 2025, decided on 10.03.2025 2 letter dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P-4), whereunder petitioner and his wife-Smt. Divya have been called to attend personal hearing on 26.04.2025. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that she has instructions to state that office order dated 07.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) be treated to have been withdrawn qua the petitioner. She further submits that the case of the petitioner and his wife will be considered in accordance with the directions issued in Lal Chand’s2 case. In view of above, since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, the present writ petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 09, 2025 Judge Mukesh