IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 313 of 2024 ---------- Manager Singh, son of late Ishwar Singh, resident of Deepatoli, near Zimkhana Club, P.O. Bariatu, P.S. Sadar, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra, Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization, PO & PS Hirapur, Dist. Dhanbad, Jharkhand. …….. Opp. Party With Cont. Case (C). No. 321 of 2024 ---------- Mahadeo Tirkey, son of late Inder Tirkey, resident of House No. B.H.N. 28, Bandunagar, Birsa Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra, Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization, PO & PS Hirapur, Dist. Dhanbad, Jharkhand. …….. Opp. Party with Cont. Case (C). No. 320 of 2024 ---------- Harish Chandra Mahto, son of late Kesho Mahto, resident of Qr. No. D/T- 1252, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra, Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization, PO & PS Hirapur, Dist. Dhanbad, Jharkhand. …….. Opp. Party with Cont. Case (C). No. 324 of 2024 ---------- Raghvendra Pratap Singh, son of late Rameshwar Singh, resident of Flat No. A-1, Kishore Enclave, Patelnagar, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Argora, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra, Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization, PO & PS Hirapur, Dist. Dhanbad, Jharkhand. …….. Opp. Party 2 with Cont. Case (C). No. 322 of 2024 ---------- William Kandulna, son of late Yakub Kandulna, resident of Pahan Toli, 2nd lane, P.O. Bariatu, P.S. Sadar, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra, Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization, PO & PS Hirapur, Dist. Dhanbad, Jharkhand. …….. Opp. Party CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhat Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Ms. Chaitali Ch. Sinha, AC to AAG-IA Ms. Sweta Shukla, AC to AAG-II Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, AC to AAG-III For the CMPFO : Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Karbir, Advocate ---------- 08/ 06.01.2025 Heard the parties. It has been very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the opposite party-CMPFO that the order of this Court has been complied with in its true letter and spirit. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not object to the same. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. Resultantly, all these instant contempt petitions stand disposed of. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) kunal