Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1158 (HP)

SHARDA GAUTAM AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/21004/2025 · 2026-01-02

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.21004 of 2025 Decided on: 02.01.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sharda Gautam and Ors …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ seek applicability of Yashwant Kumar Vs. State of HP and Ors2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners, would be content in 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 8148 of 2022, decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 case they are permitted to file representation to the respondent/Competent Authority for redressal of their grievances and the respondents/Competent Authority is directed to decide the same within a time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed by permitting the petitioners to file representation within two weeks, which shall be decided by the respondents /Competent Authority within six weeks from the date of receipt of the same, in accordance with law and also keeping in view the aforesaid judgment. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 02, 2026 Judge R.Atal